Wir2030

This post is also available in:

Explanation and justification

The human body is not the property of the state, not a platform for political programs and not a resource for global experiments. It is an expression of dignity, freedom and self-determination – and therefore inviolable.

Every medical intervention – whether preventive, therapeutic or experimental – affects the integrity of the human being. It is therefore only ethically permissible if it is based on informed, voluntary and individual consent. It was precisely this principle that was enshrinedin the Nuremberg Code of 1947after the crimes of National Socialism – as a reaction to coercive experiments and medical arbitrariness.

“The voluntary consent of the test subject is absolutely essential.”
– Nuremberg Code, first guiding principle

These guiding principles are not historical relics. They apply universally – even today. Even in times of crisis. Even if the language is modern, the intentions are good and the measures are global.

---

What happened during the crisis

The events of recent years show that even basic ethical standards can be eroded under the pressure of fear, power and economic interests.

• New, experimental substances were introduced worldwide under emergency approvals – without long-term studies, without real freedom of choice.
• The Nuremberg Code was ignored by using social pressure, existential blackmail and one-sided information to persuade people to participate in large-scale medical experiments.
• Enlightenment was manipulative, not neutral: with reward systems, access restrictions, psychological warfare in communication.
• Doctors who wanted to fulfill their responsibility towards patients were defamed, punished or excluded from the system.
• Individual freedom of choice was replaced by state “recommendations”, which de facto resulted in coercion – in schools, companies, nursing homes and clinics.

This made people part of a global risk study – not as partners, but as objects.

---

Why this must never happen again

Once you accept that the end justifies the means, you open the door to the misuse of science, medicine and technology.

The Nuremberg Code is non-negotiable. It is a bulwark against state arbitrariness in the medical field.
Likewise the Geneva Pledge – the modern form of the Hippocratic Oath – which every doctor takes:

“I will not use my medical art to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat.”
– Medical Pledge of the World Medical Association (WMA), Geneva Declaration

This formulation not only obliges doctors towards their patients – but also protects them against political pressure and abuse of power.
They are committed to the well-being of people – not to the government, not to the zeitgeist, not to industry.

When doctors become enforcers of measures that they themselves are not allowed to question, the art of healing becomes an instrument of power.

---

Our position

We2030 demands: Human dignity must remain inviolable even in crises. Medicine must never become a tool of the state to guide behavior. And no doctor, nurse or researcher should ever again be put in the position of having to choose between professional ethics and obedience.

No political agenda – no matter how nobly formulated – justifies coercive medical measures.

No emergency in this world cancels the Nuremberg Code.

No promise of progress should reduce people to a means.

People are not guinea pigs.
And anyone who makes them into guinea pigs is abandoning the principles of enlightenment, humanity – and history.