Wir2030

This post is also available in:

Explanation and justification

The legitimacy of state action derives from the consent of the governed.
In a democracy, this means that governments are bound by constitutions, national laws, the separation of powers – and above all by the inalienable rights of the individual.
However, in recent times we have seen a worrying development:
Governments that disregard national sovereignty – with reference to “global threats”.
They conclude treaties with international organizations without parliamentary oversight.
They commit to measures that affect entire peoples without obtaining their consent.

But no mandate – not that of a health ministry, not that of a world organization – ever authorizes the imposition of universal coercive measures on individuals.

What it’s really about

Compulsion means:

• Compulsory vaccinations under threat of social and professional exclusion
• Compulsory testing or masks regardless of individual risk assessment
• Travel or assembly bans due to digital entries
• Quarantine or access restrictions without a court order
• Health monitoring with centralized data systems

If such measures are not controlled by national parliaments, but coordinated and enforced at a global level,
a transnational dictatorship without democratic backing will emerge.

Our position

We2030 says:
No government – neither individually nor collectively – has the right to impose global coercive measures on millions of people without individual freedom of choice, without consultation, without co-determination.
There is no “global exception” that abrogates fundamental rights.
International law is not above the dignity of the individual.

No government in the world may introduce global coercive measures.
Those who allow this do not create protection – but a system of global paternalism.