Wir2030

This post is also available in:

Explanation and justification

Health is not a government task in the sense of control, but a personal decision and responsibility. It is inextricably linked to freedom, self-determination and trust. Every person is unique – in their body, their experiences, their risks, their biography.
Therefore, health cannot be centrally planned or created through coercion.

And yet we are currently experiencing how, under the pretext of health protection, more and more surveillance, paternalism and incapacitation are taking place – particularly through the introduction of the electronic patient record (EPR).

---

The true meaning of health

Health is not created by order, but by:

• healthy eating and exercise,
• mental stability and social relationships,
• free therapy decisions and personal responsibility.

No law, no system and no file can replace this.

A state can make recommendations, provide access to information, support medical professions – but it must not instrumentalize the body, thoughts or decisions of the individual.

---

What happens when the state wants to enforce health?

• Vaccination obligations, compulsory treatment, mask or test requirements disempower the individual.
• They ignore medical individuality and destroy trust in doctor-patient relationships.
• People are stigmatized or excluded if they decide otherwise for good reasons.

Coercion does not create trust – it creates resistance, fear and long-term psychological damage.

---

The digital danger: the electronic patient file (ePA)

The introduction of the ePA is being sold as progress – but it is a massive attack on privacy, freedom of therapy and medical confidentiality.

Why is the ePA dangerous?

• Centralization of sensitive health data makes citizens transparent – for health insurance companies, authorities, the pharmaceutical industry and tech companies.
• Access rights of third parties (even without informed consent) undermine medical confidentiality.
• Voluntariness is effectively abolished – anyone who does not actively object is automatically recorded.
• The data can be used against people: for tariff classification, compulsory medication, social control or, in the worst case, to eliminate critical voices.
• In the digital health dictatorship, health is becoming a data commodity – and people are becoming an exploitable resource.

---

Our understanding of health

We2030 stands for:

• Education instead of paternalism
• Personal responsibility instead of monitoring
• Freedom of therapy instead of standardization
• Data protection instead of total coverage

Health belongs to people – not the state.

---

Our position

Health is a sensitive, deeply personal area of life. Anyone who uses coercion here – be it physical, psychological or digital – is crossing a red line.

That is why we say no to electronic patient records without explicit consent.
No to medical conformity.
No to a digital health dictatorship.

Because:
Health cannot be forced – it is an individual responsibility.