{"id":1269,"date":"2025-05-31T07:31:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-31T04:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/?p=1269"},"modified":"2025-05-31T21:32:22","modified_gmt":"2025-05-31T18:32:22","slug":"thesis-14-anyone-who-censors-criticism-has-something-to-hide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/05\/31\/thesis-14-anyone-who-censors-criticism-has-something-to-hide\/","title":{"rendered":"Thesis 14: Anyone who censors criticism has something to hide."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Explanation and justification<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Criticism is the pulse of every free society.<br\/>It is the living sign of a democracy, the early warning system of power, the corrective of institutional errors.<br\/>Where criticism is allowed, power can be <strong>questioned, scrutinized and corrected<\/strong>.<br\/>Where it is suppressed, <strong>arbitrariness, corruption and tyranny<\/strong> grow.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A state, a system, an institution that seals itself off from criticism loses its <strong>legitimacy<\/strong> &#8211; because it reveals:<br\/><strong>It no longer serves people, but itself.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Why criticism is indispensable<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Criticism is <strong>not an attack<\/strong>, but a sign of spiritual alertness.<br\/>It shows that a person is taking responsibility &#8211; for the common good, for truth, for development.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Criticism is:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>a <strong>tool for finding the truth<\/strong>: Only if theses can be doubted can a distinction be made between error and knowledge.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>a <strong>form of vigilance<\/strong>: power needs counter-power, control needs counter-control.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>an <strong>outlet for resentment, without violence<\/strong>: criticism channels frustration constructively. Suppressed criticism, on the other hand, often discharges destructively. <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>prerequisite for progress, learning and change<\/strong>: whether in science, art, medicine or politics &#8211; without criticism there is stagnation or regression.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Freedom of opinion and speech<\/strong> are therefore not just civilizational ideals, but concrete <strong>protective mechanisms against the abuse of power<\/strong>.<br\/>Where they are absent, a society of fear &#8211; not of truth &#8211; emerges.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What censorship really is<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Today, censorship is often sold as a \u201cprotective measure\u201d &#8211; against disinformation, against hatred, against \u201csocial division\u201d.<br\/>But that is an illusion.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Censorship is in truth:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>the <strong>attempt to end discussions<\/strong> before they have even been held,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the <strong>will to secure hierarchies of power<\/strong> by delegitimizing criticism,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the <strong>instrument for suppressing uncomfortable truths<\/strong> that are politically, economically or ideologically dangerous,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the <strong>attempt to<\/strong> gain <strong>control over reality<\/strong> by silencing alternative points of view.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Censorship does not protect against lies &#8211; it protects lies from being exposed.<\/strong><br\/>Those who cannot stand criticism are not afraid of error &#8211; but <strong>of the truth<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Current forms of censorship<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In democratically constituted societies, censorship no longer manifests itself primarily through book burnings or open bans.<br\/>It is more subtle, more sophisticated &#8211; and therefore all the more dangerous. It operates through: <\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u201cFact checks\u201d<\/strong> that <strong>devalue dissenting opinions across the board<\/strong> with apparent objectivity,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Deletion of posts on social networks<\/strong> without any legal basis or transparent justification,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Platform blocking, shadow banning, demonetization<\/strong> &#8211; digital methods of social exclusion,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Vague legal terms<\/strong> such as \u201cdelegitimization of the state\u201d, \u201chate speech\u201d or \u201cdisinformation\u201d that create a climate of intimidation,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Professional repression<\/strong> against critical doctors, scientists, journalists, artists or civil servants who deviate from the official line.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Censorship doesn&#8217;t just destroy individual voices &#8211; it destroys the debate itself.<\/strong><br\/>And without debate, there is no democracy.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Historical and international examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1. the White Rose (Germany, 1942-1943)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The siblings <strong>Hans and Sophie Scholl<\/strong> and their fellow campaigners in Munich distributed leaflets against the Nazi regime.<br\/>They warned of injustice, called for resistance against Hitler and appealed to conscience.<br\/>Their criticism was <strong>true<\/strong> &#8211; but it was punished as \u201chigh treason\u201d.<br\/>Hans and Sophie Scholl were <strong>executed<\/strong> on February 22, 1943.<br\/>Their courage lives on as a reminder: <strong>truth needs protection &#8211; not persecution<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2 Julian Assange (Australia \/ Great Britain \/ USA)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2010, the founder of <strong>WikiLeaks<\/strong> published leaked documents proving war crimes committed by the US army in Iraq and Afghanistan, including the shooting of civilians.<br\/>Assange became the target of worldwide persecution, isolated in an embassy for years, later imprisoned in Belmarsh maximum security prison.<br\/>Not because he had lied &#8211; but <strong>because he<\/strong> had <strong>documented the truth<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3 Edward Snowden (USA \/ Russia)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2013, the former NSA employee uncovered the <strong>mass surveillance of the US and international population<\/strong> by intelligence agencies.<br\/>He was prosecuted and has been living in exile ever since.<br\/><strong>His revelations<\/strong> sparked worldwide outrage &#8211; <strong>not against the surveillance agencies, but against him.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4. Nelson Mandela (South Africa)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mandela was branded a <strong>terrorist<\/strong> for decades because he opposed the apartheid regime.<br\/>He spent <strong>27 years in prison<\/strong> &#8211; for a truth that is now considered a self-evident human right: <strong>all people are equal.<\/strong><br\/>Today he is revered &#8211; back then he was censored.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>5. Ai Weiwei (China)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Chinese artist and activist criticized corruption, environmental destruction and human rights violations in the People&#8217;s Republic of China.<br\/>He was <strong>arrested several times<\/strong>, his works banned, his voice suppressed &#8211; even though he spoke truths that many in the country shared but were not allowed to express.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>6. Dr. Simon Goddek, Prof. Bhakdi, Dr. Bodo Schiffmann, Dr. Wodarg and many others (International, since 2020)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>During the COVID-19 crisis, numerous scientists and doctors who expressed well-founded criticism of measures, vaccination policy or lockdowns were <strong>censored, defamed, excluded from professional associations or deleted from platforms<\/strong>.<br\/>They asked questions, presented data, warned &#8211; and were declared \u201cGef\u00e4hrder\u201d (\u201cdangerous\u201d) for doing so.<br\/>In many cases, it only became clear months later that <strong>their criticism was justified<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>7. Oleg Orlov (Russia, 2024)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>The human rights activist and co-founder of Memorial was sentenced to <strong>2.5 years in prison<\/strong> in 2024 for calling Putin&#8217;s war against Ukraine \u201cfascist\u201d.<br\/>His \u201ccrime\u201d: <strong>an essay<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>8. Prof. Carl Heneghan &amp; Dr. Tom Jefferson (UK)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>The two scientists from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criticized the evidence behind lockdowns, mandatory face masks and school closures during the coronavirus pandemic.<br\/>Although they presented renowned studies, their voices were relativized by fact-checkers, discredited by the media and censored on social platforms.<br\/>The public debate gave way to a climate of exclusion &#8211; not because they were spreading false information, but because their <strong>facts<\/strong> were <strong>politically undesirable<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9 Dr. Jordan Peterson (Canada)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>The psychology professor became internationally known because he opposed a Canadian law that wanted to introduce the mandatory use of certain gender pronouns.<br\/>He did not criticize the people in question &#8211; but the <strong>state&#8217;s compulsion to regulate language<\/strong>.<br\/>His stance led to massive media attacks, calls for a boycott, restrictions on his university teaching and ultimately the revocation of his psychotherapeutic license.<br\/>Not because he had acted unethically &#8211; but <strong>because he disagreed<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>10. trucker protests in Canada (2022)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>Tens of thousands of Canadian truck drivers protested peacefully against mandatory vaccinations and excessive coronavirus measures.<br\/>Instead of dialog, the Trudeau government opted for defamation: they were labeled extremists, even though they did not cause any violence.<br\/>accounts were frozen, donation platforms blocked, supporters monitored &#8211; a <strong>completely extrajudicial form of digital repression<\/strong> against citizens who expressed a dissenting opinion.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>11. Dr. Simon Thornley (New Zealand)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>The epidemiologist at the University of Auckland disagreed with New Zealand&#8217;s \u201czero COVID\u201d strategy and warned of the risks of new vaccines.<br\/>Despite factual and scientifically based statements, he was labeled \u201cdangerous\u201d in the media, shunned by experts and pushed out of the public discourse.<br\/>Not because he was talking nonsense &#8211; but <strong>because he did not submit to the consensus<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>12th Billy Te Kahika Jr (New Zealand) <\/strong><br\/><br\/>Musician, politician and activist who publicly spoke out against authoritarian measures during the corona crisis.<br\/>His social media accounts were deleted, events banned, supporters criminalized &#8211; not for violence or agitation, but <strong>for opinions critical of the government<\/strong>.<br\/>The state acted as if it were in a state of war against words &#8211; not against deeds.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>13. Prof. Didier Raoult (France)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>The French star virologist became famous when he advocated the use of hydroxychloroquine at the beginning of the pandemic.<br\/>What followed was an unprecedented downfall: censorship of his research, political influence on his clinic, massive defamation in the press.<br\/>Although studies later supported many of his statements, his reputation remained damaged &#8211; <strong>not because he was wrong, but because he was uncomfortable<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>14. gilets jaunes &#8211; the yellow vests (France)<\/strong><br\/><br\/>The movement began as a protest against rising fuel prices, but quickly developed into criticism of social inequality and a lack of civic participation.<br\/>The state&#8217;s response: massive police violence, restrictions on freedom of assembly, censorship of alternative reporting, surveillance of organizers.<br\/>What began as a democratic protest was reinterpreted as a \u201cthreat\u201d by targeted state measures &#8211; <strong>and systematically suppressed<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These examples show impressively:<br\/> Censorship<strong>is not a relic of past dictatorships<\/strong> &#8211; it is a real danger in the midst of modern democracies.<br\/>It does not always occur with open bans &#8211; but in the form of pressure, exclusion, de-platforming, withdrawal of licenses, media agitation or targeted delegitimization.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Truth is often uncomfortable.<br\/>But you can recognize a free society by how it deals with uncomfortable truth.<\/strong><br\/>The value of freedom of opinion is not shown by applause &#8211; but by contradiction.<br\/><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Why this is dangerous<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Censorship is not a side effect &#8211; it is a <strong>system error<\/strong>.<br\/>Denn:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Where criticism is forbidden, <strong>no error<\/strong> can be <strong>recognized<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where dissent is suppressed, <strong>scientific honesty<\/strong> dies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where dissenting voices are considered \u201cenemies\u201d, <strong>political paranoia<\/strong> arises.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where truth becomes a threat, <strong>lies are a matter of state<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Anyone who eliminates criticism not only destroys freedom &#8211; but <strong>also trust<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Censorship is an act of fear.<\/strong><br\/>And a society that is afraid of the truth is <strong>not stable &#8211; it is sick.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Our position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>We2030 demands:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>An <strong>end to censorship<\/strong> &#8211; by the state, platforms, algorithms, media and scientific institutions<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Full protection of critical voices<\/strong>, regardless of their popularity or political classification<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Restoring a genuine culture of discussion<\/strong> &#8211; with respect, openness and a willingness to disagree<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A <strong>public review of all cases of politically motivated censorship, exclusion and repression<\/strong>, especially since 2020<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The <strong>rehabilitation of<\/strong> those who have been unjustly defamed, deleted or silenced<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Because:<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Anyone who censors criticism has something to hide.<\/strong><br\/>A society that no longer allows criticism is not free &#8211; it is on the path to authoritarianism.<br\/><strong>Truth needs courage. And protection. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Explanation and justification Criticism is the pulse of every free society.It is the living sign of a democracy, the early warning system of power, the corrective of institutional errors.Where criticism is allowed, power can be questioned, scrutinized and corrected.Where it is suppressed, arbitrariness, corruption and tyranny grow. A state, a system, an institution that seals [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":112514394,"featured_media":1256,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[10096796],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-englisch"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-05-26-10.49.58-AM.png?fit=626%2C524&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgv6KY-kt","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1165,"url":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/05\/28\/thesis-71-a-good-state-protects-its-critics-not-its-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":1269,"position":0},"title":"Thesis 71: A good state protects its critics &#8211; not its power.","author":"boschimo","date":"28. May 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explanation and justification The true maturity of a state is not shown in the applause of the majority,but in how it deals with the dissent of the minority. Approval is comfortable, predictable, controllable.But criticism is uncomfortable, unpredictable - and therefore valuable. Criticism is not an attack, but an early warning\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Englisch&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Englisch","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/category\/englisch\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/menschen-verschiedener-meinung-europaer-vor-dem-bundestag-statt-weissem-haus.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/menschen-verschiedener-meinung-europaer-vor-dem-bundestag-statt-weissem-haus.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/menschen-verschiedener-meinung-europaer-vor-dem-bundestag-statt-weissem-haus.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/menschen-verschiedener-meinung-europaer-vor-dem-bundestag-statt-weissem-haus.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":767,"url":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/05\/18\/thesis-35-anyone-who-defends-democracy-is-not-an-extremist\/","url_meta":{"origin":1269,"position":1},"title":"Thesis 35: Anyone who defends democracy is not an extremist.","author":"boschimo","date":"18. May 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explanation and justification Democracy thrives on the commitment of its citizens - not on their submission.Anyone who defends it, points out grievances, demands fundamental rights and opposes the abuse of power is not acting radically, but democratically. This thesis sets a clear boundary against a dangerous narrative: Criticism is not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Englisch&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Englisch","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/category\/englisch\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-13.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-13.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-13.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-13.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":809,"url":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/05\/17\/thesis-3-dictatorship-begins-where-the-media-are-aligned\/","url_meta":{"origin":1269,"position":2},"title":"Thesis 3: Dictatorship begins where the media are aligned.","author":"boschimo","date":"17. May 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explanation and justification A free society thrives on open discourse, the clash of opinions, the competition of ideas. The media play a key role here: they should inform, educate and control - not indoctrinate. They are the unofficial fourth pillar of the separation of powers. However, when all the major\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Nicht kategorisiert&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Nicht kategorisiert","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/category\/nicht-kategorisiert\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-4.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-4.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-4.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-4.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1446,"url":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/06\/10\/thesis-11-science-thrives-on-contradiction-not-on-consensus\/","url_meta":{"origin":1269,"position":3},"title":"Thesis 11: Science thrives on contradiction &#8211; not on consensus.","author":"boschimo","date":"10. June 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction: Science is not a dogma - but a dialog with reality Science begins where curiosity meets reality - not where authority decides what has to be true.It thrives on observation, criticism, revisability - and above all on courageous doubt. It is not the consensus, not the majority and not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Englisch&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Englisch","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/category\/englisch\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":875,"url":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/05\/17\/thesis-9-any-measure-without-debate-is-a-blow-to-democracy\/","url_meta":{"origin":1269,"position":4},"title":"Thesis 9: Any measure without debate is a blow to democracy.","author":"boschimo","date":"17. May 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explanation and justification Democracy thrives on debate - on the open exchange of different opinions, on public debates, on criticism, counter-speech and correction. Decisions that affect everyone must never be made in the shadows. They must be in the public eye - justified, scrutinized and discussed. Where debate ends, arbitrariness\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Englisch&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Englisch","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/category\/englisch\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-10.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-10.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-10.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-10.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":732,"url":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/2025\/05\/21\/thesis-34-crises-reveal-the-character-of-those-in-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":1269,"position":5},"title":"Thesis 34: Crises reveal the character of those in power.","author":"boschimo","date":"21. May 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explanation and justification In normal times, it is easy to appear statesmanlike, make compromises and emphasize democratic values.But in times of crisis, the mask falls.When power comes under pressure, it becomes clear which image of humanity, which attitude and which ethics actually guide political action. This thesis is a reminder:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Englisch&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Englisch","link":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/category\/englisch\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-19.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-19.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-19.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wir2030.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-19.png?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/112514394"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1269"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1269\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1405,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1269\/revisions\/1405"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wir2030.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}